Skip to main content
HeartCited

Coenzyme Q10.

Albert E Raizner
Review Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal 2019 53 인용
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'heartcited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D31687097'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

연구 유형
Review
대상 집단
None
중재
Coenzyme Q10. None
대조군
None
일차 결과
None
효과 방향
Mixed
비뚤림 위험
Unclear

Abstract

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is among the most widely used dietary and nutritional supplements on the market. CoQ10 has several fundamental properties that may be beneficial in several clinical situations. This article reviews the pertinent chemical, metabolic, and physiologic properties of CoQ10 and the scientific data and clinical trials that address its use in two common clinical settings: statin-associated myopathy syndrome (SAMS) and congestive heart failure (CHF). Although clinical trials of CoQ10 in SAMS have conflicting conclusions, the weight of the evidence, as seen in meta-analyses, supports the use of CoQ10 in SAMS overall. In CHF, there is a lack of large-scale randomized clinical trial data regarding the use of statins in patients receiving contemporary treatment. However, one relatively recent randomized clinical trial, Q-SYMBIO, suggests an adjunctive role for CoQ10 in CHF. Recommendations regarding the use of CoQ10 in these clinical situations are presented.

요약

The weight of the evidence, as seen in meta-analyses, supports the use of CoQ10 in SAMS overall and in CHF, where there is a lack of large-scale randomized clinical trial data regarding theUse of statins in patients receiving contemporary treatment.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers